Friday, December 23, 2005

Immigrant Trafficking—Shan Wei Yu

We have discussed quite a bit in the last couple of weeks. For example, we discussed Representative Smith’s new trafficking legislation and last . We have also discussed human smuggling operations in and . Yesterday, a Texas man was sentenced for immigrant trafficking and .[1]

According to federal authorities, Shan Wei Yu brought more than 1,000 illegal immigrants into the United States to work at Asian restaurants.[2] He organized the operation through his company, Great Texas Employment Agency, using Chinese-language advertisements to offer restaurants cheap labor from Mexico, South America, and Central America.[3] Mr. Yu earned at least US$900,000 for the workers he placed at restaurants, earning him a rebuke from US District Judge Ralph Erickson: “This is a human tragedy you are dealing in. … This is somebody who seeks out people looking for an American dream, even if it is an illegal American dream.”

During a 15-month stretch, Mr. Yu hired drivers to deliver at least 40 illegal immigrants to Asian restaurants in North Dakota, where he was convicted.[4] Mr. Yu earned US$150 per worker, while the drivers earned US$300; the US$450 was deducted from the worker’s first month paycheck.[5]

In addition to being sentenced to nine years in prison, Mr. Yu was forced to forfeit interest in his home, business proceeds, bank accounts, and cash found in his home during an investigatory raid.[6]



[1] , Austin American Statesman, Dec. 22, 2005.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Transnational Crimes Weekly Recap


Click here for video

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb will be a guest on Fort Collins, Colorado’s tomorrow morning. He is scheduled to be on the air with Gail Fallen and Keith Weinman at 8:05 AM Mountain Time (10:05 AM Eastern), and he will be discussing recent developments in the extradition of Raul Gomez-Garcia. You can listen to the interview on the internet .

Human Trafficking—Senate Approval

The Senate has “overwhelmingly approved” Representative Chris Smith’s Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005.[1] Last , we noted the passage of the House version of the bill, pointing out that it clearly authorizes extraterritorial jurisdiction over the military and its civilian attendants for -related crimes.

According to Rep. Smith, “estimates by the Congressional Budget Office [suggest that] the bill will provide $361 million to combat trafficking.”[2] Furthermore, it “reauthorizes and expands appropriations for anti-trafficking programs in the United States and abroad and offers solutions to specific scenarios where additional initiatives are needed to combat trafficking problems, such as in peacekeeping missions.”[3] Under the legislation, a $25 million grant program for local law enforcement agencies will be created to assist in the investigation and prosecution of “human trafficking (and related offenses) and [the grant] includes initiatives to attack the demand for prostitution, which fuels sex trafficking.”[4]

Furthermore, the US Code is amended to “strengthen the use of money laundering, racketeering and civil and criminal forfeiture statutes against traffickers.”[5] Under section 103 of the bill, (c)(7)(B) is amended by adding a new subsection vii to the list of definitions of the term “specified unlawful activity.” The new 18 U.S.C. § 1956(c)(7)(B)(vii) would include “trafficking in persons, selling or buying of children, sexual exploitation of children, or transporting, recruiting or harboring a person, including a child, for commercial sex acts,” as an unlawful activity. Furthermore, the definition of racketeering activity as codified by (1)(B) would be amended by striking “1581-1591” and inserting “1581-1592,” bringing (pertaining to document fraud in furtherance of “trafficking, peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor”) into the definition of racketeering activity.

President George W. Bush has signaled that he “will sign the legislation.”[6]



[1] Representative Chris Smith, , US Newswire, Dec. 22, 2005. The House version of the bill is H.R. 972.EH.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Counterfeit Currency—North Korea

When Sean Garland was arrested in Northern Ireland at the beginning of , it seemed a rather innocuous event. He was, if you recall, accused of engaging in “buying, transporting and either passing as genuine or reselling large quantities of high quality notes.’[1] The allegation that he had obtained those notes from North Korea seemed, at the time, almost beside the point.

That is not the case now as an enormous amount of attention has been directed at North Korea and allegations that that country is producing massive quantities of counterfeit notes and distributing them across the globe. In fact, the United States’ chief delegate at the six-party talks on North Korea’s nuclear weapons programs, Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, said yesterday that “he and other foreign diplomats, including those from South Korea, have accepted evidence that North Korea is counterfeiting American $100 bills.”[2] Mr. Hill has said that he has actually seen the so-called “supernotes” in person, and that “if someone gives you a $100 note, look at it very carefully.”[3]

The implications of these counterfeited bills are far-reaching. In a story we discussed in , the Macau-based Banco Delta Asia was designated by the US Department of Treasury [hereinafter DOT] as a “primary money laundering concern” under the less-well-known [4] of the USA PATRIOT Act.[5] At the time of the announcement, the DOT mentioned somewhat in passing that “[o]ne well-known North Korean front company that has been a client of Banco Delta Asia for over a decade has conducted numerous illegal activities, including distributing counterfeit currency and smuggling counterfeit tobacco products.”[6]

The counterfeit currency that has been allegedly distributed is said to amount to “tens of billions of dollars.”[7] That is at least 100 million separate $100 bills that have allegedly been produced and distributed into the world’s markets. And since Mr. Garland’s arrest, the issue of these “supernotes” has become a bigger story than it had originally seemed. For example, casinos in Las Vegas are noticing that some of these bills have been used in casinos on the Strip, but they don’t see it as too large a problem.[8] According to the US Secret Service, Las Vegas casinos “probably take in $50,000, $60,000, $70,000 in counterfeit money in town per week.”[9] Furthermore, both the conclusion of “Operation Smoking Dragon,” which we discussed in , as well as the subsequent indictment of two Chinese men accused of trying to smuggle MANPADS, which we discussed in early , are related to the increased attention to the Korean “supernotes.”

The recent attention on North Korean counterfeiting activities comes after 15 years of investigations which suggest that the “counterfeiting operation began a quarter-century ago at a government mint built into a mountain in the North Korean capital. Using equipment from Japan, paper from Hong Kong and ink from France, a team of experts was ordered to make U.S. $100 bills. … ‘The main motive was to make money, but the secondary motive was inspired by anti-Americanism.’”[10] The indictment and extradition request of Sean Garland, as well as the denomination of Banco Delta Asia as a primary money laundering concern, are now seen as pieces of a long-scale puzzle that is intended to “starve impoverished North Korea of as much as $500 million a year in profits from counterfeiting currency and other criminal activities.”[11]

As the United States prosecutes these allegations, it will prove extremely tricky to prevent the six-party talks from collapsing. The State Department might like to think that “law enforcement matters are not six-party, not diplomatic, nor political issues,”[12] but North Korea is not likely to take these allegations very lightly in the least.



[1] Henry McDonald, , The Observer, Oct. 9, 2005.
[2] , Kyodo News, Dec. 20, 2005.
[3] Id.
[4] Codified at .
[5] US Money Laundering Accusation Ignites Resentment in Macao, Asia Pulse via Yahoo!, Sept. 19, 2005, no longer available online; see also Macau Bank’s Customers Withdraw, CNN.com, Sept. 19, 2005, no longer available online; DOT, , Sept. 15, 2005.
[6] DOT, supra note 5.
[7] Kyodo News, supra note 2 (emphasis added).
[8] Howard Stutz, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Dec. 16, 2005.
[9] Id.
[10] Josh Meyer, et al., , LA Times, Dec. 12, 2005.
[11] Id.
[12] Kyodo News, supra note 2.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been quoted extensively in an article about former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio’s federal indictment.
Douglas McNabb, principal of McNabb Associates, a law firm specializing in the defense of individuals charged with white-collar crimes, said that each count carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in Federal prison.

McNabb noted that several other former Qwest executives had been indicted and agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors.

"They've reached a plea agreement with the government that says they'll plead guilty to certain offenses and assist the government with regard to the prosecution of others. They may be called to testify at trial against this gentleman," he said.



According to McNabb, the overall conviction rate in cases brought by the DoJ is about 91 percent, and the government wins roughly 86 percent of its cases on appeal.

He said the trial could take six to eight weeks; if Nacchio loses, he can appeal to the 10th Circuit Court, also located in Denver. After a loss there, Nacchio could petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal, but the Supremes can decline to do so.

"When you've been indicted by the U.S. government," McNabb said, "that hill you have to [climb] over gets even taller."[1]


[1] Susan Kuchinskas, , InternetNews.com, Dec. 20, 2005.

Illegal Fishing—Northern Australia

So far this year, Australia has seized 250 vessels, and detained more than 1,000 fishermen, for allegedly fishing in Australia’s northern waters in contravention of the law.[1] These statistics have come to light as Australia’s Fisheries Minister, Senator Ian Macdonald, has been meeting with his Indonesian counterpart, Rear Admiral Freddy Numberi, in an attempt to have both countries work together to find out whether “organized crime and big international syndicates are behind illegal fishing in Australia’s northern waters.”[2]

When the talks began, Sen. Macdonald was somewhat pessimistic, saying that the end of illegal fishing “seem[ed] a long-term strategy,” but Adm. Numberi has taken a “very cooperative approach.”[3] Part of this approach includes “coordinated patrols on sea borders between the two countries” as well as launching a joint investigation into whether organized crime really is behind the illegal fishing.[4]

The joint patrols would not only “reduce the number of incursions into Australian waters, but also reduce the number of Indonesian nationals being arrested in Australia.”[5] Australia claims that Indonesians are venturing into Australia’s waters for shark fins, a key delicacy which can fetch up to A$200 a kilogram.[6]

Previous to these negotiations, Sen. Macdonald “had been hoping to find a way to jail the illegal fishermen, who must now be repatriated under a United Nations convention.”[7] Under article 73 of the , a coastal state may, “in the exercise of its sovereign rights,” take necessary measures to ensure compliance with the Convention, “including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings.” However, upon the posting of a reasonable bond or other security, the arrested vessels and their crews must be promptly released.[8] It seems that this was a sticking point that has become less so. Adm. Numberi has recently said that Indonesia only needs to be informed more promptly when its fishermen are arrested.[9]



[1] , ABC (Australia), Dec. 19, 2005.
[2] Id.
[3] , ABC (Australia), Dec. 20, 2005.
[4] Id.
[5] , Reuters (via Jakarta Post), Dec. 21, 2005.
[6] Id.
[7] ABC, supra note 1.
[8] UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Oct. 10, 1982, art. 73, para. 2, 21 I.L.M. 1261 (1982).
[9] ABC, supra note 1.

Monday, December 19, 2005

Trafficking in Arms—Fernando Sero Sentencing

A Philippine-born New Yorker has been sentenced to 40 months in prison “for and weapons parts in the southern Philippines.”[1] Fernando Sero pleaded guilty on June 29, 2005, and was sentenced on December 15 for violating the Arms Export Control laws by smuggling weapons to the southern island of Mindanao between 2003 and 2005.[2] According to prosecutors, Mr. Sero carried out his scheme by purchasing the weapons—which included AK-47s, M-16s, AR-15s, and HK-94s, as well as weapons parts and ammunition—and then smuggling them to Mindanao by falsifying shipping documents and sealing them in boxes containing light fixtures and electric car coolers.[3] At least four shipments had been intercepted by Philippines authorities.[4]

Trafficking in arms is a which takes very seriously. According to Interpol, there are two major initiatives that relate to conventional weapons: the “Orange Notice,” and the Interpol Weapons Electronic Tracing System [hereinafter IWeTS].[5] The Orange notice was initiated in January 2004 and it “provides a warning about weapons when there is reason to believe that it will help law enforcement and security officials identify a threat they might not normally detect.”[6] This type of notice relates to objects, not individuals, and in 2004, there were 15 Orange Notices issued by Interpol.[7] The IWeTS is a long-term project that relates “exclusively to the tracing of firearms through an automated system.”[8] The goal of the IWeTS is to make it easier for law enforcement officers in member countries to trace firearms that move internationally, while the second goal is to “increase the population of the Interpol Criminal Information System with firearm trace recovery data.”[9]

In the United States, the Arms Control Export laws are covered by . Under this section it is illegal for a person to export articles which are designated on the US Munitions List without first obtaining a license or written authorization from the Department of State.[10] The punishment for violating this section is a fine of up to $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.[11]



[1] , Reuters, Dec. 19, 2005.
[2] US. v. Sero, 05-CR-00340-01 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (available through PACER); see also US Attorney’s Office, , June 29, 2005 [hereinafter USAO]. (PDF)
[3] Reuters, supra note 1; see also USAO, supra note 2.
[4] Reuters, supra note 1.
[5] Interpol, , last visited Dec. 19, 2005.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] Id.
[10] 22 U.S.C. § 2778(b)(1)(A)(ii)(III).
[11] Id. § 2778(c).