Saturday, August 20, 2005

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb is quoted in the Toronto Star in an article about Lord Conrad Black.
Several lawyers who specialize in cross-border extradition cases say that if he wanted to, Black might be able to stall U.S. officials seeking his possible extradition for more than a year.

"He's got money and it's not a terrorist act," said Douglas McNabb….

McNabb was one of several lawyers specializing in extradition cases who said yesterday that the U.S. justice department seems to have needlessly complicated its case against Black by not waiting until he was in the U.S. before announcing charges against Radler.

Even if U.S. officials weren't prepared to announce an indictment against Black to coincide with Radler's, "they still could have issued a criminal complaint against Black, which would still have given them 30 days to file the indictment," said McNabb.

He was recently an expert witness at an extradition hearing involving a trio of former Enron bankers in the U.K.

"That effectively would have landlocked Black, and prevented him from leaving the country," McNabb said.

He added that the Department of Justice "just doesn't seem to strategize very well on cases like this."[1]


[1] Rick Westhead, He’s the Ultimate Prize, Toronto Star, Aug. 20, 2005.

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been quoted in the Las Vegas Review-Journal regarding a bribery case there.
Douglas McNabb, who specializes in federal cases involving white-collar crimes, said Kenny's testimony could be "incredibly harmful."

Prosecutors will try to convince the jury that even though they might not like Galardi or Kenny, the government needed them because "it takes a rat to catch a rat," McNabb said.

McNabb has not listened to the recorded telephone calls, but through media reports he is familiar with the conversations included in the federal government's indictment.

"From a practical standpoint, he's got a super, uphill climb," McNabb said of Malone.

"I think that in federal criminal cases, in the juror's mind, the defendant did what the United States government said he did, or he wouldn't be sitting there."[1]


[1] Adrienne Packer, Bribery Allegations: LV Case Called Stronger, Las Vegas Review-Journal, Aug. 14, 2005.

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been mentioned in three Canadian Press articles today.

The first:
…U.S. authorities need to move quickly to lay charges against Black to get a potentially lengthy case started, said Douglas McNabb, senior principal at McNabb Associates….

McNabb said he's heard rumours that U.S. authorities could announce charges within a week.



There's little reason to see why Britain would prevent Black's extradition, McNabb said, since in 2003 the country changed its own extradition laws allowing the U.S. to extradite people as long as they could prove charges were pending.[1]
The second and third are substantially the same:
…U.S. authorities need to get the potentially lengthy case started quickly, said Douglas McNabb, senior principal at McNabb Associates….

"The U.S. cannot seek Mr. Black's extradition until after he has been charged," said McNabb, adding he's heard rumours U.S. authorities could announce charges within a week.



Even if charged and facing extradition, Black has several legal and appeal options that could drag out the extradition case for a few years at least, McNabb said.

"He's not a terrorist, he's a white collar guy, and he's got money and he's prepared to fight it," McNabb said from Houston.

Black, who gave up his Canadian citizenship a few years ago in a dispute with former prime minister Jean Chretien over a British peerage, could face years of prison time, "absolutely, without doubt if he's convicted," McNabb said.[2]


[1] Will Black Face Charges Next?, Canadian Press, Aug. 20, 2005.
[2] Gillian Livingston, et al., Black Could Put Up Fight, Canadian Press, Aug. 20, 2005; see also, Gillian Livingston, Black to the Wall: Mogul Won’t Go Down Without a Fight, Canadian Press, Aug. 20, 2005.

Friday, August 19, 2005

Kingpin Act

The United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control [hereinafter OFAC] has identified 30 companies and individuals associated with two Mexican drug trafficking cartels.[1] Pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act [hereinafter Kingpin Act], the assets of these front companies can be frozen, and U.S persons are prohibited from engaging in financial and commercial transactions with the designated organizations.[2]

The organizations named in the OFCA report are the Arriola Marquez Organization, and the Arellano Felix Organization.[3]

The Arriola Marquez Organization is based in Saucillo, Chihuahua, and it controls a significant flow of marijuana and cocaine from Mexico into the United States.[4] The fronts associated with this organization are two cattle businesses, two real estate firms, an automotive sales company, a gasoline distributor, a food distributor, and a currency exchange house.[5]

The Arellano Felix Organization is based in Tijuana, Baja California, and it orchestrates the transportation, importation, and distribution of tons of cocaine and marijuana, as well as large amounts of heroin and methamphetamine.[6] The fronts associated with this organization are linked to a large Mexican drugstore chain.[7]

The Kingpin Act is codified at 21 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. The relevant statute to this action by OFAC is 21 U.S.C. § 1904, which states that it applies to any significant foreign narcotics trafficker which has been publicly identified.[8] On the date that a designating announcement is made, the property and property interests of any significant narcotics trafficker or persons providing support to significant narcotics traffickers are blocked.[9] Furthermore, any transactions between a United States person and the designated significant narcotics trafficker are prohibited, as are any transactions that evade or attempt to evade the prohibition.[10]



[1] OFAC, Press Release: Treasury Targets Front Companies and Individuals Tied to Mexican Drug Cartels, Aug. 18, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] 21 U.S.C. § 1904(a).
[9] Id. § 1904(b).
[10] Id. § 1904(c).

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been quoted in an article about impending charges against Lord Conrad Black.
But U.S. authorities need to move quickly to lay charges against Black to get a potentially lengthy case started, said Douglas McNabb, senior principal at McNabb Associates...

"The U.S. cannot seek Mr. Black's extradition until after he has been charged," said McNabb, adding he's heard rumours that U.S. authorities could announce charges within a week.



Even if charged and facing extradition, Black has several legal and appeal options that alone could drag out the extradition case for a few years at least, McNabb said.

"He's not a terrorist, he's a white collar guy, and he's got money and he's prepared to fight it," McNabb said from Houston.[1]


[1] Gillian Livingston, Long Battle Expected for Black, Canadian Press, Aug. 19, 2005.

Trafficking in Narcotics

Adela Lara-Barajas was convicted on August 17, in McAllen, Texas on four separate counts that included: conspiracy to import into the U.S., possession with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 13 kilograms of methamphetamine worth an estimated street value of $350,000.[1]

On April 2, Ms. Lara-Barajas was arrested when, during a routine border inspection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officers discovered 13 kilograms (28.6 lbs.) of methamphetamine concealed inside a hidden compartment located in the rear of her car.[2] Ms. Lara-Barajas was arrested and turned over to ICE special agents without incident.[3]

Trafficking in narcotics is a serious transnational crime.

Conspiracy to Import Narcotics and to Possess with Intent to Distribute
Both conspiracy to import narcotics and to possess with intent to distribute are covered by 21 U.S.C. § 846. It states that any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense covered by the narcotics laws of the United States will be subject to the penalties prescribed for a completion of the offense.

Possession with Intent to Distribute
Possession with intent to distribute is covered by 21 U.S.C. § 841. It states that it is a crime for a person to possess with the intent to distribute any controlled substance.[4] Methamphetamine is a controlled substance.[5]

The punishment for violating section 841 with more than 50 grams of methamphetamine can be as much as life in prison, a fine of up to $20 million, or both.[6]

Ms. Lara-Barajas’s sentencing is scheduled for October.[7]



[1] United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Press Release: Mexican National Convicted of Narcotics Trafficking, Aug, 17, 2005, [hereinafter ICE] available here.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
[5] Id. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).
[6] Id. § 841(b)(1)(A).
[7] See ICE, supra note 1.

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

International Telemarketing Scam

It is being reported that a plea agreement is near completion with one of two people charged in Seattle with operating an international telemarketing scam out of Vancouver, Canada.[1] The scheme involved the two men writing to elderly people in the United States and Great Britain, and telling them that they had won a foreign lottery but would have to pay upfront fees to collect the winnings.[2] The two men are in Canada, awaiting extradition hearings.

This case, involving Bruce and Stephen Ironside, is considered a very significant transnational crime.[3] According to the FBI, the two brothers caused losses of over $2 million.[4] In October 2003, they were arrested on federal charges of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1302, 1343, and 2326, and were indicted in the Central District of California.[5] The brothers are also the subject of a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit brought in a civil case in the Western District of Washington.[6]

Mailing Materials Related to Lotteries
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1302, it is a crime for a person to send in the mail anything that concerns a lottery or similar scheme that offers prizes that are dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance.

Violating section 1302 can result in a fine, imprisonment for up to five years, or both.

Wire Fraud
We have previously discussed 18 U.S.C. § 1343, the wire fraud statute, in connection with Alexander Yakovlev, here.

Telemarketing Fraud Against the Elderly
18 U.S.C. § 2326 states that a person who is convicted of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 in connection with a telemarketing scheme will be imprisoned for up to five years in addition to the penalty levied under section 1343.[7] However, if the scheme victimized ten or more people over the age of 55,[8] or if the scheme targeted people over the age of 55,[9] that person can be punished by up to 10 years in prison in addition to any punishment levied under section 1343.[10]



[1] Plea Deal Reported for One of Two Brothers in Telemarketing Case, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Aug. 17, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.
[3] Federal Bureau of Investigation, Financial Crimes Report to the Public G6 (2005), available here (PDF).
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Federal Trade Commission, Press Release: Cross-Border Con: FTC and Canadian Authorities Shut Down Telemarketers Calling Foreign Lottery “Winners”, Oct. 29, 2003, available here.
[7] 18 U.S.C. § 2326(1).
[8] Id. § 2326(2)(A).
[9] Id. § 2326(2)(B).
[10] Id. § 2326(2).

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Immigration Fraud

A federal judge in Los Angeles sentenced Amber Ming Ding to nine years in prison and ordered her to pay $795,000 in restitution after she pleaded guilty in December to charges that included mail fraud, making false statements in immigration applications, conspiracy, and money laundering.[1] The charges to which Ms. Ding pleaded guilty are transnational crimes, criminalized by 18 U.S.C. § 1341, 18 U.S.C. § 1546, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956 respectively.

She was accused of promising immigrants that she could secure legal status for them by submitting L-1 visa applications, which are issued to employees of subsidiaries of foreign companies; most of the businesses listed on the applications, however, were nonexistent or non-operational.[2]

Mail Fraud
We have previously discussed mail fraud in conjunction with an international check scheme, here.

False Statements in Immigration Applications
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1546, it is a crime for a person to knowingly make under oath, or under penalty of perjury, any false statement of material fact in any application required by the immigration laws. It is also a crime to knowingly present such an application to authorities if it contains false statements.

A violation of section 1546 can result in a fine, punishment of up to 25 years in prison, or both.

Conspiracy
18 U.S.C. § 371 makes it a crime for two or more people to conspire to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States. One of the persons must do an act in furtherance of the conspiracy for criminal liability to apply.

The punishment for a violation of section 371 is a fine, imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both.

Money Laundering
We discussed money laundering when we discussed Alexander Yakovlev’s guilty pleas in the Oil-for-Food scandal investigation, here.


[1] Federal Judge in LA Sentences Woman for Immigration Scam, Associated Press, Aug. 15, 2005, available here.
[2] Id.

Monday, August 15, 2005

International Check Scheme

The Associated Press is reporting today that individuals operating out of Turkey and possibly Latvia are running an international check scam.[1] Job hunters who had posted their resumes on the internet were contacted and “hired” by a company calling itself “Void Computers, Inc.”[2]

An applicant would then be asked to help the company cash “warrants”[3] from the State of Arkansas, and if the applicant accepted the offer, he was sent warrants in his name with instructions to cash them and wire the money to a bank in Latvia, minus a ten percent fee that the consumer may keep.[4] The applicant is also encouraged to avoid banks, and use check cashers, liquor stores or similar businesses instead.[5] About ten days later, the consumer would receive two counterfeit checks mailed from Turkey, with the consumer’s own name and address printed on them.[6] To date, eight checks have been cashed, totaling about $21,000.[7]

Arkansas’s Attorney General, in addition to conducting an investigation himself, has consulted with the U.S. Postal Inspectors Office and the FBI.[8]

The behavior described in this story is both a federal crime and a transnational crime. It could be wire fraud, mail fraud and counterfeiting of State securities. Wire fraud is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, mail fraud is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and counterfeiting of State securities is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 513.

Wire Fraud
We have previously addressed wire fraud in conjunction with Alexander Yakovlev, here.

Mail Fraud
Under section 1341, it is a crime for a person who has devised a scheme to defraud or to obtain money by false pretenses to procure for unlawful use any counterfeit coin, obligation, or security by the use of the United States mails. It is also mail fraud for a person to use the United States mails to further a fraudulent scheme.

The punishment for mail fraud is a fine of up to $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to 30 years, or both.

Counterfeit State Securities
Section 513(a) makes it a crime for a person to make, “utter,”[9] or possess a counterfeited or forged security of a state.

The punishment for violating section 513(a) is a fine, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both.

A “security,” as used in this section can mean a check[10] or a warrant.[11] Furthermore, the distinction between “counterfeited” and “forged” is: a counterfeited document purports to be real but is not, because it has been falsely made or manufactured in its entirety;[12] a forged document purports to be real but is not because it has been falsely altered, completed, signed, or endorsed, or it contains false additions or insertions, or it is a combination of parts of two or more genuine documents.[13]




[1] James Jefferson, Forged State Checks Object of International Scam, Associated Press, Aug. 15, 2005, available here (free subscription may be required).
[2] Id.
[3] As used in this context, “warrant” means “[a] document conferring authority, esp. to pay or receive money.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1617 (8th ed. 2005).
[4] Jefferson, supra note 1.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] In this context, “utter” means “[t]o put or send (a document) into circulation; esp., to circulate (a forged note) as if genuine.” Blacks Law Dictionary 1582 (8th ed. 2005).
[10] 18 U.S.C. § 513(c)(3)(A).
[11] Id. § 513(c)(3)(D).
[12] Id. § 513(c)(1).
[13] Id. § 513(c)(2).

Sunday, August 14, 2005

McNabb in the News

Senior Principal Douglas McNabb has been mentioned in an article about three former Nevada elected officials accused of corruption.
Douglas McNabb, who specializes in federal cases involving white-collar crime, said [Erin] Kenny's testimony could be "incredibly harmful" against her ex-colleagues.

Prosecutors will try to convince jurors that while they might not like [Michael] Galardi or [Ms.] Kenny, the government needed them because "it takes a rat to catch a rat," McNabb said.[1]


[1] , Associated Press, Aug. 14, 2005.